Mercer Flanagan CPA
Industry

Engineering & Architecture Firms: The R&D Credit and 179D

Roy Cogliandolo, CPA
March 28, 2026 · 4 min read
Engineering & Architecture Firms: The R&D Credit and 179D

If your firm has ever developed a new structural approach, tested an unconventional design solution, or worked through real technical uncertainty on a project, you may already be doing R&D work the tax code rewards — most engineering and architecture firms just never claim it.

If you run an engineering or architecture firm anywhere in Frederick County or central Maryland, two federal incentives are worth real attention this year: the R&D tax credit, and a separate, design-specific deduction most firms have never heard of.

Yes, Design Work Can Qualify as R&D

The R&D tax credit isn't limited to laboratories and product manufacturers. To qualify, work needs to rely on engineering, scientific, or technological principles, aim to develop or improve a product, process, or design, and involve genuine experimentation to resolve real technical uncertainty — developing a new structural system, testing an unconventional building approach, or working through a design problem that didn't have an obvious answer from the start.

What doesn't qualify: routine design work using established, standard methods, market research, and quality control after a design is already finalized. The distinction the IRS draws is between genuine technical uncertainty and resolving it through experimentation, versus simply applying well-established design practices to a new project.

Architect and builder laughing over a laptop at a plan-covered table

A Genuinely Good Change: Immediate Expensing Is Back

For years, a rule under Section 174 forced firms to capitalize and amortize domestic research costs over five years rather than deducting them immediately — a change that quietly increased tax bills for firms doing qualifying R&D work, sometimes dramatically. Recent legislation restored the ability to fully and immediately deduct domestic research expenses starting in 2025, which is a meaningfully better outcome for firms doing genuine R&D-qualifying design work. Foreign research costs still have to be amortized over 15 years, so where your design and engineering work actually happens matters more than it used to.

Domestic research costsImmediate expensing is back
Foreign research costsStill amortized over 15 years
Domestic research costsPreviously forced into 5-year amortization
Foreign research costsWhere the work happens matters more than it used to
Fig. 01A Genuinely Good Change: Immediate Expensing Is Back
Research LocationCurrent Treatment
Domestic (U.S.-based) researchImmediately deductible in the year incurred
Foreign researchAmortized over 15 years

A Real Window for Small Firms to Go Back and Claim This

If your firm's average annual gross receipts are under roughly $31 million, you may be eligible to amend returns from 2022 and 2023 to fully expense research costs that were previously forced into the slower amortization schedule, along with updating related elections. This lookback window is time-limited, with the relevant amendment deadline running through mid-2026 — meaning firms that qualify and haven't acted yet are working against a real, approaching cutoff, not an open-ended opportunity.

Average annual gross receipts — under this, you may qualify
Returns you may be able to amend
Bearded man in a navy shirt holding a tablet at night

The 179D Deduction: A Genuinely Architecture-Specific Incentive

Separate from the R&D credit, Section 179D offers a deduction for designing energy-efficient commercial buildings. What makes this particularly relevant for architecture firms: for projects involving tax-exempt entities — public schools, government buildings, nonprofit-owned facilities, religious institutions — the building owner often can't use the deduction themselves, since they don't pay federal income tax. In these cases, the deduction can be allocated to the person primarily responsible for the building's design, meaning your firm, not the building's owner, may be able to claim it directly.

What Actually Supports a Claim

Recent updates to the relevant IRS form now require firms to clearly explain what was developed, why the work qualifies as genuine research, and what it cost — at the level of individual projects or business components, not just a lump total. Firms that tag time entries to specific projects, document the technical uncertainty being resolved, and keep this contemporaneously rather than reconstructing it later are in a far stronger position if a claim is ever reviewed.

Bearded man in glasses and a navy blazer reading a tablet

How We Help Maryland Engineers & Architects

At Mercer Flanagan, we work with engineers and architects throughout Frederick County and central Maryland to evaluate whether your design work qualifies for the R&D credit, assess whether the small business lookback window applies to your firm, and explore 179D opportunities on projects involving tax-exempt building owners.

Laughing woman with pink-tipped hair using a gold tabletLaughing young woman on a phone call eating lunch outdoors
Has Your Firm Ever Looked Into the R&D Credit?

Book a free consultation and we'll walk through your specific situation — no pressure, no obligation.

Frequently asked questions

No. If your staff uses engineering or design expertise to resolve genuine technical uncertainty on a project, that work may qualify even without a formally separate research department.

This article is for general informational purposes and reflects tax rules current as of 2026. R&D credit and 179D eligibility depend on specific facts and documentation — speak with a CPA before making decisions based on this information.